|
HEAD OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHARITY SLAMS THE FUNDING SYSTEM |
| Written by Stroud Valleys Project | |
| Wednesday, 02 April 2008 | |
|
As a quarter of the staff are made redundant in the district’s leading environmental charity, one of Stroud Valleys Project’s Director of Projects condemns the way that charities are funded as being an hinderance to the cause of creating a better society. Lack of vision, caveats placed upon grants, refusal to see people as an invaluable resource, plus stiffling bureaucratic red tape are preventing real progress from being made. Stroud Valleys Project has been working with local communities to help them make a positive difference to their local environment for 20 years this year. But just when environmental issues are the highest they’ve ever been on the political and social agenda, this small charity is staring closure in the face due to ever more restrictive conditions placed upon charities by the funders and the business regulatory system. Funders don’t want to fund staff or core costs, both of which are essential to enabling community action to happen. They don’t want to fund existing projects no matter how successful they’ve been, preferring to fund new and ‘innovative’ projects. Grants for more than one year’s costs are extremely unusual making it very difficult to properly develop and run projects – by their very nature, wildlife and environmental projects are long-term. Grants from central Government to support environmental action at the ‘grass roots’ level don’t appear to exist, and money is being diverted from some of the Lottery pots of money towards the costs of the Olympics. Because of the above funding straight-jackets, closure of Stroud Valleys Project by the end of the summer is on the cards and so sweeping cuts to budget have had to be made. Two of the 7 members of staff are being made redundant, and the hours of 4 of the remaining jobs are being cut by 33% to 50%. Caroline Aistrop, who has worked for Stroud Valleys Project for 13 years this month and for the environmental sector for 22 years, decided to be one of the staff given redundancy. "Every year we face this same situation because many funders don’t want to pay for more than a year. It’s a constant slog to keep preparing funding bids and then when you do get money, you’re hardly into delivering the project when you have to start fund-raising all over again. Then there’s the problem of getting enough money to pay staff as funders seem to think that projectsmysteriously appear out of thin air, and that effective and talented staff are a luxury. Our 7 members of staff have worked with nearly 1,000 adults and children in the past 2 years alone illustrating the domino effect of good employees." "And a new funding fashion which has appeared over the past few years is the demand for applications to be for new projects. This really grinds us down as it takes many years to turn land into good wildlife habitat and to tackle environmental problems so it seems ridiculous to say that a project isn’t worth funding just because it’s a year or two old. We consistently meet our targets, the people we work with say that we do a fabulous job, you can see with your own eyes the positive difference that our work is making. Yet this seems to count for nothing to many prospective funders. We wonder sometimes what is the point of doing a good job, other than the fact that we want to do it for the people we’re working with." Caroline continued "Those of us who work in the charitable sector do so because we want to make a difference, not spend our time writing bids and then preparing the huge amount of paperwork that funders demand once you have a grant to check that you’re doing the work. Some funders want you to send photocopies of every purchase a project has made which is over £50 as well as detailed work reports. It’s an absolutely crazy way to run the charitable world. If I was being cynical, I’d say that if the powers that be wanted to appear to support worthy causes and improving society, but actually wanted to prevent it as much as possible, then they’d invent the funding system that we’ve got at the moment." Caroline decided when she was 13 years old that she wanted to work in wildlife conservation. She began working in the environmental movement when the vast majority of people didn’t have a clue what it was about. "When people asked me what I did for a living, I usually lied as they either thought I worked on a Greenpeace anti-whaling ship or was just plain weird." "I’m very sad to go, but after 13 years I don’t have the energy any more for all this funding game. Not to mention the amount of work caused by meeting the legislative system for employment law, health and safety, company law, and similar, which for a charity employing only 7 people takes up a significant amount of time." - ENDS - FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Caroline Aistrop Telephone: 01453 753358 or 07894-663436 Fax: 01453 755641 Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it Website: www.StroudValleysProject.org |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Architecture Automotive Books / Publishing Books /Publishing Business Computer Consumer Design Education Employment/Careers Engineering Environment Events/ Trade shows Finance/Money Gaming Government Home and Family Industry Insurance Latest News Legal and Law Lifestyle Maritime Media Medical Misc Music News Non Profit Politics Religion Science and research Self Help Society Sports Technology Telecoms News Trade Transportation Travel/Hospitality Wine
Bookmark with:
What are these?